Legislators – at all levels – are notorious for mandates
that are unfunded and ill-defined. While at a first blush, this can be
frustrating, it is also liberating. We, at our district and site levels, have
the opportunity to shape implementation of these mandates to meet the needs of
our communities. And it is a lot of work. Just as we want our students to
collaborate with their peers to meet real world challenges, so should we.
This week was all about networking: Q-Comp Leadership
Network, Teacher Development and Evaluation (TDE) Community of Practice, and
the District 287 Teaching and Learning Network. Internally we networked this
week as well when we brought together our Innovation Coaches from each site,
our parent representatives, and representatives from the Minnetonka Foundation.
In all of these instances I walked out with greater clarity around my next
steps, and possibilities for improving processes.
Student learning goals are one component of teachers’
evaluation in the recently enacted teacher evaluation law. At the Q-Comp
Leadership Network, my colleague from Edina shared the rubric that they are
using to evaluate teachers’ student learning goals. Rather than focusing on
just the results, they will take into consideration the implementation of the
strategies being used to meet the goal as well as reflections on the
implementation. By including both the implementation of and reflections on the
learning, they are recognizing the complexity of student learning. Similarly, at
the TDE Community of Practice, my colleague from Anoka Hennepin shared a rubric
that they are using to evaluate student learning goals as well. They, too,
recognize and value that goal setting has many facets. Principals will consider
five components of the student learning goal: determining needs, creating
goals, planning instructional strategies to meet the goal, monitoring student
progress, and reflecting on the goal. These two rubrics will be great
conversation starters when our TDE committee meets again in November.
It’s also been pretty awesome to watch the internal
networking of our Innovation Coaches. After some initial brainstorming in
person, the conversation around our innovation efforts has continued in their
Schoology group. They’re having fun as they decide how to further the culture
of innovation in Minnetonka.
Every meeting we attend is an opportunity for different experiences
to collide. As our networks expand, so do our perspectives. And our loads are a little lighter as a
result.